AtlasTexas
County workspace
Crockett County
crockett-county

Crockett County county intelligence

Cross-source county ranking context from the Atlas county explorer service, with committed Wave 1 analytics overlays to help answer what changed and why.

View watchlists

Saving to the shared watchlist workspace.

Common county terms
Texas Water Development Board (TWDB)Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)Public Water System (PWS)
29.06
Composite score
189
Composite rank
4
Highlight lanes
Wave 1 risk rank
Investigation context

Weather + hydrology context for Crockett County

Composite operating context — active hazards, hydrologic features, surface-water condition, and infrastructure footprint — pulled from cached snapshots only.

Active hazard footprint
0 active alerts

No NWS-driven alerts active in the cached water-summary feed. Drought + precipitation context land once those snapshots are committed.

No sewer overflow rows in the 30-day window.

Hydrology features
5 TWDB features

EDWARDS-TRINITY · Brazos · Colorado · Rio Grande

1 Major Aquifers · 3 Major River Basins · 1 HUC 8 Hydrologic Units

Surface water condition
No segments cached

No TCEQ-classified surface segments in this county for the cached assessment year.

Drinking-water exposure
No SDWIS violations cached

No cached SDWIS health-based violation rows in this county since 2023-04-01.

Stream gauge coverage
0 active gauges

No active stream gauges in the cached water-summary feed. Hydrologic stress signal lands once gauges fold in.

USGS streamflow anomaly + drought class join in next-up.

Boil-water proxy · microbial rule
No microbial violations cached

No SDWIS rule-group 100 microbial violations cached for this county. Tier-1 boil-water-equivalent events activate this lane when they post.

Treatment stress · E2 disinfectant
No disinfectant violations cached

No cached SDWIS rule-group 200 disinfectant violations in this county. Treatment-stress signal activates as new D/DBP rule violations post.

Analytics snapshot

Risk trend from committed snapshots

Uses the committed county-history artifact only. Atlas does not backfill imaginary periods; if a previous snapshot is missing, this panel says so.

Updated 2026-05-09 22:08:46Z
Trend panel waiting on committed history

This county renders with current explorer context now, but the Wave 1 cache does not yet provide a prior county-history row for period-over-period interpretation.

Interpretation

What this means

Crockett County currently stands out most on water districts within the explorer scoring stack.

This page is showing the live county explorer breakdown only. Trend language appears once the committed analytics cache includes this county in county-history, county-movers, and pressure-risk artifacts.

Grounding and caveats

County analytics are derived from committed SDWIS, ACS county population, surface-water-quality, and TWDB hydrology snapshots. History appends one real snapshot per run and never fabricates prior periods.

  • countyRiskScore is the statewide 0-100 normalization of summed SDWIS DWRS raw scores per county.
  • pressureScore is the statewide 0-100 normalization of impaired segment counts per 100k residents when population is available; otherwise it falls back to raw impaired segment count.
  • Rank deltas compare the newest county-history snapshot against the immediately preceding real snapshot.
  • Both axes are normalized to a 0-100 statewide range for stable chart consumption.

Driver decomposition

Top explorer lanes ranked against the statewide county stack. Percentile and contribution values are derived from the reusable Wave 1 analytics spine.

No ranked driver decomposition was available beyond the current highlight list.

Top systems behind the county signal

When county-history carries system-level highlights, Atlas surfaces the systems contributing the most to the latest committed risk snapshot.

No top-system highlights were available in the committed county-history record for this county.

Operator lane

Operators visible in this county snapshot

Ranked only from the current permittee and CID applicant snapshot. Atlas links out where operator presence is visible; it does not invent a deeper hierarchy or historical market share.

0 visible operators
No operator grouping is visible for this county in the current permit and CID snapshot.

County ↔ operator navigation

Move from county stress to named operators

County rankings show where signal concentrates. Operator pages show which named permittees and applicants are currently visible inside that signal.

This county currently has no grounded operator crosslink from the permit/CID dataset, so Atlas keeps the page anchored in county and permit context only.
  • • County page: risk, hydrology, and statewide rank context.
  • • Operator page: county footprint, open CID case posture, and pending permit roster.
  • • Permit view: county-scoped transaction list for the current public snapshot.

Highlights

Top-ranked source lanes per the cached county overview.

Water districts
Rank 103 · Value 2
Permits
Rank 185 · Value 3
County returns
Rank 194 · Value 4602.65
CPI investigations
Rank 216 · Value 210

Hydrology and surface-water condition fold into the investigation context block above; Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) + Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) features are shared with the water county profile.